such_heights: amy and rory looking at a pile of post (stock: reach out and touch)
Amy ([personal profile] such_heights) wrote2010-10-19 02:10 pm

seasonal fests and boundary policing

Sign-ups are open for [livejournal.com profile] rs_small_gifts until October 30th! The one fest that keeps dragging me back to HP.

But folks, can we quickly chat about exchange requests and boundary policing? I know, because I used to do it myself, that it's frequently standard fandom practice to put in a list of kinks that you don't like - 'the usual squicks like scat, bloodplay, watersports', 'none of that icky body fluid stuff' - etc etc.

Let's talk about a couple of the reasons why that's a problem:

1. It relies on a ridiculous premise, namely that there are all these kinky types waiting in the wings to spring on your request and write you watersports fic unless you specifically state otherwise. People want to write things that you'll like! Therefore, they are likely to work based on the things you've listed that you like, rather than assuming that anything you haven't specifically listed in your request is fair game.

Trying to make a complete list of things you dislike would be absurd, we'd be here all week. Keep it simple, specific, and mostly based on things that people genuinely might think to write for you unless you mention it, and it's all be fine. For instance, I've mentioned 'drunkenness' as a thing in my sign-up because it's a common story device in Remus/Sirius fic and one I don't personally like. Giving a long list of kinks you don't like, using derogatory language, being vague (what do you mean by 'the usual squicks' or 'kink' anyway?) or naming rare-in-fandom kinks is unnecessary and unhelpful.

2. And the reason that the above is a particular problem is because the continuous reinforcement of certain kinks as 'gross', 'icky', 'weird' etc is a method of boundary policing and holding up some pretty crappy fandom norms. It shames people who might otherwise want to request and write those things, and it shames people for whom whatever kink in question isn't just a fictional like but a real life practice or interest. By participating in that kind of behaviour you contribute to a culture in which some things are acceptable and others are not, and really we could all do without that.
rian: (Default)

[personal profile] rian 2010-10-20 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
OK, I can see that you didn't mean what your original post implies, so that's fine, I agree that people should be respectful when wording these things. Respect goes both ways though, so I actually don't think that it's silly to name all your dislikes regardless of what sort of fest it is. It's when people assume things that a kerfuffle happens. Even when you are explicit in your likes and dislikes, things can be ignored, as has been pointed out with that case of the fic with all the person's squicks in it. I also have a friend who explicitly requested no bestiality in an exchange and yet got a fic with bestiality in it. It's best to be clear about everything, in as diplomatic a way as possible, so there can be no misunderstanding.