such_heights: amy and rory looking at a pile of post (sga: jumper)
Amy ([personal profile] such_heights) wrote2009-12-15 12:52 am

Question Time!

Calling my geologically inclined friends: please excuse a little lazy-webbing and help me resolve a debate with my father. Is there a non-arbritrary way of distinguishing a planet's north from its south, one that doesn't simply rely on convention? And if not, does that make all sci-fi talk of an unhabitated planet's southern hemisphere etc completely nonsensical?

... These are the things that keep me up at night.
elsane: clouds, brilliance, and the illusion of wings. (Default)

[personal profile] elsane 2009-12-15 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
(hi! I'm mostly offline these days but just happened to log on in time for a question I am professionally qualified to answer, so!). Yes! It makes sense to have north and south poles unambiguously. It's determined by the direction of the planet's rotation. The angular momentum of a planet is a vector directed along its axis of rotation -- north means along the vector, south means against the vector.

Or in other words, sit on the equator facing the sunrise. This unambiguously determines east, and therefore north and south. (:

hope you are doing well, A.