lls_mutant: (Default)
lls_mutant ([personal profile] lls_mutant) wrote in [personal profile] such_heights 2010-10-19 07:20 pm (UTC)

Sadly, there are a few people who make what should seem like unnecessary boundary policing feel necessary. I asked for a D/s Sirius/Remus fic one year. Got it, but it also contained bestiality. Not "complete" bestiality, but sure as hell enough that it crossed a line for me. I didn't even think to state that one, and there it was in an exchange fic. ::sigh:: (It was not a small gifts fic, though.)

I've actually just come to the point now where I say "I'm fine with explicit material, but I'm a pretty vanilla sort of girl" in anonymous exchanges. If it's a small exchange or I know the group (like on [community profile] gaeta_squee), I might be a little more specific, but usually, I'd rather people shoot for under my limits than over them. The other thing I generally add is "canon pairings only" or list the pairings I do like, because there ARE popular pairings that I can't handle in fandoms I like (Simon/River, for example), and it's a nice way to say I'm uncomfortable there.

I really don't have a problem with people listing their dislikes, though. I mean, there are a lot of people that really, really dislike very common tropes. (I like consensual violence in sex, for example. Lots of people don't, and understandably so. I can't stand infidelity. Doesn't bug tons of people.) I think where the problem comes in is the commentary. I don't find "no non-con, violence, or anal, please" offensive in the least, personally, but if someone adds the "because that's ICKY!" part, then it becomes offensive.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org