such_heights: amy and rory looking at a pile of post (other: teenage feminist)
Amy ([personal profile] such_heights) wrote2008-09-23 07:03 pm

Grr and argh, excuse me while I get my feminist on

I've got a few rants that have been building for a while now. This is the more general one that I think I'm going to let blow this evening.

I get angry, you see. I get really bloody angry about the way so many people talk about gender and sexuality - in the news, in fiction, at the table next to me in the student bar.

I get angry that working, professional women are constantly referred to as 'girls'. I'm a nineteen-year-old student, I'm a girl. The 25-year-old woman who was at the reception desk this morning or presenting a TV show or winning a sporting medal or calling you on behalf of a company - yeah, I'm pretty sure she's a proper adult. No, it's not the semantic equivalent of 'guy', it's patronising, doubly so when you're speaking in a professional capacity.

I get angry, because "'women' is not an acceptable generalisation." (Bones, I love you so very much.) 'Gay men', 'lesbians', 'bisexuals' and 'transsexuals' aren't either, please stop it.

I get angry that Bones is a shining beacon of positive and interesting portraits of women in an otherwise bleak mainstream TV world. Every ensemble work of fiction should be able to come up with characters like Brennan and Angela and Cam, who have agency and storyline potential and flaws and general win, and it shouldn't be noteworthy in the slightest.

I get angry every time I watch a film or turn on the TV or pick up a book and women are there solely to be the receptacles of male love, where they don't get given purpose, or where if they have careers then they can't possibly be both effective in them and have romantic feelings of any sort - their pining will affect their job, or they'll chuck in that nasty, high-pressure working environment to go be with their man, whereas men get to be spurred on and inspired to heroics by their own loves.

I get angry that being female and single is a tragedy no matter what the individual wants, but being a bachelor is a-okay.

I get angry that so many women have been sufficiently coded by society to believe the previous point is true.

I get angry that people believe so emphatically that gender is a binary, and that 'women' and 'men' can be lumped together in a big comfy group of similar traits.

I get angry when people are mocked for being 'girly', that women need to be One Of The Boys to be taken seriously and that men must fit into some sort of super-macho paradigm.

I get angry that being gay is innately hi-larious - after all, gay people are all one big homogeneous (and lest we forget, entirely sex-obsessed) group that conform to all your stereotypes, totally!

I get angry that being gay is acceptable as long as you're not 'camp' or 'butch', heaven forbid.

I get angry that the concept of varying degrees of bisexuality is apparently too much for some people.

I get angry that people are viewed so differently once it's revealed they're gay. I get seriously angry when it's used to tar them professionally - gay school teachers, sports coaches, the list goes on and on, and I get really mind-boggingly angry that gay people are so widely assumed to be unable to keep their hands to themselves and are pretty much a step away from paedophilia at any moment.

I get angry that people are so impossibly offensive about anyone who doesn't conform to their own ideas of gender identity. Transgendered folks aren't real people, you know! They certainly didn't go to your school, work in your office, sit next to you on the bus this morning and they're definitely don't get on with their lives like everyone else. ... oh, wait.

I get angry when people don't talk about each other as if they're just that: people.

I get angry about how much crap fandom itself pulls on these sorts of issues. The amount of vitriol directed against female characters (beautifully discussed by [livejournal.com profile] lyras here the other day), the way het and femslash are so regularly described as being 'icky' because omg girlparts, the way people throw around the most staggering rude language.

I get angry, because I know I've been guilty of perpetuating some of this myself, maybe still am if I don't watch myself effectively, and I get angry every time I let people talk like this around me and don't say a damn thing.

I get angry that people don't take me seriously when I do talk about this, that I'm accused of taking things too personally or being overly emotional or young or whatever else. After all, I am a man-hating lesbian feminazi (as the icon, that I really should acquire, says, wanting equal rights is just like invading Poland!) who should shut the hell up because I'm making a big deal out of nothing. Ugh ugh ugh.

The list goes on, but I do believe I shall stop now. The point is, I get so mad about all of the above and more, and then I come on here and remind myself that amongst the wank and the nonsense there is all of you, and many more people on LJ besides, who are sane and smart and generally awesome. Thank goodness for that.

[identity profile] glass-icarus.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
&hearts &hearts &hearts &hearts &hearts

WORD, most definitely in the general sense and particularly fandomwise, because how is it that all these fangirls go "EW" over het and femslash when we ourselves are female? i understand if you aren't particularly interested in it, but girlparts should not squick you when you can see them clearly in your mirror! and also, \o/ for your point about single women! i once had that conversation with a friend of mine, and i got the most incredulous look when i said i'd been happily single for the better part of my life, barring the two months with my ex- and i hadn't been noticeably happier in those two months either, except in the exciting getting-to-know-you sort of way.

[identity profile] glass-icarus.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I really can understand not being that into reading het, because it's kind of everywhere anyway and fandom's a good place to avoid it- exactly my feelings on it, though as you said, it depends on the fandom. i personally don't read femslash because, so far, i haven't come across a fandom with compelling female characters for whom i find subtext- and frankly, any non-canon relationship without subtext can only go so far, in my opinion.

We do not need relationships to complete us!- again, EXACTLY. my friend J put it best when we spoke about her last boyfriend: "without him, my life is full. with him, it's almost overfull." the world would be a much better place if we could all think like that!

[identity profile] glass-icarus.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Which is a tragedy all of itself, how a lot of writers are really bad at giving us strong female relationships.- YES. not to say that there aren't compelling female characters; there are a lot of them- but the conflation of "compelling" and "has subtext with another female character?" not so much of that. *g*

[identity profile] glass-icarus.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, i hear that- i'd love to see more of Lily! though now that i think about it, Jacqueline Carey's Kushiel series ought to go a long way towards relieving your current frustrations, particularly the first three books. i feel the need to reread them now that we've had this conversation, just to remind myself that YES, there are strong female characters that i have absolutely no problem with. \o/
ext_29272: (Default)

[identity profile] sunnyrea.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess Firefly and Doctor Who are my only fandoms that have real honest-to-goodness subtext to play with.

Here here, can we say Kaylee and Inara?

[identity profile] tirwen-star03.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't have much to say, except WORDSAUCE! ♥

[identity profile] arasan.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
ILU. This is awesome, and totally true. I'm still trying to break out of some of the in-grown gender stereotypes I, as a woman, was saddled with from birth. We're going to make it, women! Don't give up!

[identity profile] dakinishir.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
would it be inappropriate for me to say,

YOU GO GIRL!

?
ext_11045: (Default)

[identity profile] cetacea.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Word! I agree with everything here. Although especially the stuff about bisexuality sticks out to me, because lately it seems I've just had a rash of people refusing to understand that I fall somewhere between bisexual and lesbian on a spectrum. It has to be either one or the other, and then people get all upset if they think I'm a lesbian, then find out I'm dating a guy. Argh. That probably didn't make much sense, it just frustrates me a lot.
ext_11045: (Default)

[identity profile] cetacea.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I definitely feel reluctant to even say I have a small crush on a guy because I'm worried that people will be confused and freak out. It's really quite annoying. I just want to be free to like who I like and not have to worry about other people's perceptions of my sexuality.
gorgeousnerd: #GN written in the red font from my layout on a black background. (L. Wells.)

[personal profile] gorgeousnerd 2008-09-23 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with every single point you've brought up. I admit, I haven't been too clued into feminist thought until recently -- although I've always been a big proponent of reproductive and gay rights -- so I totally know what you mean about being guilty about perpetuating.

And an massive WORD for your femmeslash thought. One of the reasons I stopped writing pairings for the most part is because either there are so few decent female characters to put in pairings and because fandom looks down upon femmeslash so frequently. So I was like, "Screw you all, I'm writing gen!" And that's probably the only thing that really pains me about Supernatural; there's so many guys and not enough girls.

I could go on and on about the perceived gender binary (ugh) and condescension and omnisexuals and such, but I'll have too many characters for one comment, heh. So, basically \o/ for you. :D

[identity profile] lefaym.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
DAMN FUCKING STRAIGHT!!!
ext_29272: (Default)

[identity profile] sunnyrea.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I am with you on all of that, esspecially:

I get angry that being female and single is a tragedy no matter what the individual wants, but being a bachelor is a-okay.
I get angry that so many women have been sufficiently coded by society to believe the previous point is true.


I mean so many times the first question people ask when they see you again after awhile is 'are you seeing anybody?' Or women that remain single all their lives are 'spinsters.' Its ridiculous! It goes back to the one you aid about how women have to supposedly be validated by a man. They can't have their own identity outside of who they are dating or fucking or how they can get a man or what man they have or want. A woman can't just be her with her traits and personality.

And these:

I get angry that being gay is innately hi-larious - after all, gay people are all one big homogeneous (and lest we forget, entirely sex-obsessed) group that conform to all your stereotypes, totally!
I get angry that people are viewed so differently once it's revealed they're gay. I get seriously angry when it's used to tar them professionally - gay school teachers, sports coaches, the list goes on and on, and I get really mind-boggingly angry that gay people are so widely assumed to be unable to keep their hands to themselves and are pretty much a step away from pedophilia at any moment.


Also how its supposedly the responsibility of a gay person to tell everyone that they are gay. Straight people don't tell me when I meet them 'oh, by the way, I'm straight.' I don't feel that my sexuality needs to be part of my introduction or something that I have to tell everyone 'just so they know.'

Also, the 'keep hands to self and one step away from pedophilia' is one reason I wasn't so sold on The History Boys that so many people had been saying was an awesome movie. I think it paints a horrible view of gay men. The only good of it was the acceptance of all the boys of their teachers and fellow student's sexuality but beyond that the move showed the teachers as (almost) unable to keep away from students and/or end up having messed up lives. (Sorry, bit of a rant of my own there)

Anyhow, I am taking up a huge comment space. But as stated, good rant and all in my head too
ext_29272: (Default)

[identity profile] sunnyrea.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah I read on Wiki how Posner's end is in the play, that's horrid and it makes it look like you can't be gay and happy or if things go good for you something has to come and mess it up Hector dying and Irwin breaking his leg which ends the possibility with Dakin

[identity profile] magnetic-pole.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay, Amy! M.
ext_22487: Fangirl and proud (Default)

[identity profile] glinda-penguin.livejournal.com 2008-09-23 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
<3 for all of this.

One of the things I love most about having my lj is that my f-list are supportive of me being all rar about gender issues (or at least the vocal ones are, some people may be disagreeing and/or humouring me but if they are they're not saying anything).

On the 'Ew girlparts' thing, I have clear memories of a rather entertaining/mortifying sex education talk at school where the nurse/health worker had a drawing up on the board of female genitalia taught us all the component parts and gave us strict instructions to take a mirror and have a good look at ourselves and also to...her words were 'explore your bodies, if you don't know what you like you'll never be able to tell anyone else'. But the bit that sticks with me is the ingrained different responses to male and female masturbation. Acceptable for boys but not girls. This idea that female genitalia were somehow 'dirty' and shameful, how wrong that idea was. Girl parts are no more and no less disgusting than boy parts. They are parts of our bodies, they just spend less time in the sun than our fingers, toes, breasts or noses, you're entitled to not find them particularly appealing but why must we perceive them as repulsive.

I'd never really considered that I might actually be lucky to have as many gender issues as I did/do have, because I can acknowledge my own body-hate, work on it and learn to love the skin I'm in for all its failings. So many girls spend so much time projecting their own body-hate onto other people and that saddens me so much. Sometimes you need to appreciate someone else's beauty (whether sexually or platonically) to see it in yourself. The human body is an amazing wonderful and above all beautiful thing, no matter the shape of the genitalia or the colour of the skin that covers it, sometimes I think we forget that.

[identity profile] lefaym.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
Your icon=WIN (as does your comment!)

[identity profile] trowicia.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
I get angry every time I watch a film or turn on the TV or pick up a book and women are there solely to be the receptacles of male love, where they don't get given purpose, or where if they have careers then they can't possibly be both effective in them and have romantic feelings of any sort - their pining will affect their job, or they'll chuck in that nasty, high-pressure working environment to go be with their man, whereas men get to be spurred on and inspired to heroics by their own loves.

WORD, SISTER. Word. Well said. *applauds*
ext_17713: sun and clouds and the illusion of wings. (Default)

[identity profile] elsane.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
oh, go, you! *♥ you madly*
ext_17713: sun and clouds and the illusion of wings. (Default)

[identity profile] elsane.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
:D :D I am running around trying to be very virtuous and productive in RL and mostly it is succeeding, which is good, because it kind of has to. so, good, mostly, though there are teeth-gritting parts. How have you been?

[identity profile] lyras.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
This was extremely cathartic to read, so god knows what it must've felt like to write! Thanks for posting. As for this:

I get angry that people don't take me seriously when I do talk about this, that I'm accused of taking things too personally or being overly emotional or young or whatever else.

God, yes. If I had a penny for every time RL friends (male and female) have told me I'm reading too much into things or taking them personally...

[identity profile] saint-claws.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly! Strict notions of gender and sexuality just don't work in the real world. They're damaging.

[identity profile] mindabbles.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
As [livejournal.com profile] lyras said, that felt good to read! I cannot tell you how wonderful it is to see a young woman with such passion and clarity. It gives me hope for the future. *says the crone* :)

Thank you for mentioning the "girly-boys" and "eeew girl parts" issue in fandom--I have a couple of unfinished essays on both of these that I will never finish. I decided that I will work on lovingly writing both into fic instead because it is better for my blood pressure.

It is absolutely maddening how people feel entitled to spew sexist, racist, heterosexist, transphobic crap and if you mention that perhaps they might be slightly incorrect on that count, you are the one causing a problem and ruining the evening with your dogmatic beliefs and lack of humor. That is something you have to expect--and you have a right to decide when you want to confront them directly, when you need to leave the room, when you just don't have the energy, and when you say something like, "I generally prefer strawberry to butter pecan."

[identity profile] mindabbles.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
There is a time and a place for politics. But, as you said, you are probably not usually the one that brings this stuff up when you don't think your opinions will be well received. And you are absolutely entitled to kick up a bit of a fuss, just as you are entitled not to if you don't want to deal with the reaction. I find that sometimes a simple, "That language bothers me" or "I don't find that to be true" can be a non-threatening middle ground. In my less tactful moments and have said, "I can't believe you just said that" perhaps with some other expletives thrown in. Sometimes people will actually learn from you. But, you are not living in the world full of unfounded fear and groundless hatred--and that is a good thing.

[identity profile] cinnamon-sakaki.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
Just. Yes. ♥♥

Ever since I started my new job I've had mild but definite sexist comments made to me...but I don't feel comfortable saying anything because they're all nice people, and I feel like I'd be doing them a disservice or something. Not to mention all the crap that a identifying-lesbian friend of mine went through when she started dating a man - LGBT support groups are meant to be, y'know, supportive!

[identity profile] secondsilk.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)
WORD!

Especially, for me at the moment, the referring to grown women as girls.
I need an angry icon, now.

[identity profile] serpentpixie.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)


:D Like, yeah, totally ;)

[identity profile] builtofsorrow.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
-flails all over you- I love you.

There's a bloke at work who asked me one time if I was a feminist (& in the oddest context too! another co-worker has just broken up with her boyfriend and was keeping up this diatribe of hatred against men, and she made some comment about how much men sucked at relationships, and I just said, 'To be honest, I think most people in general aren't great at relationships; it's not something specific to men.' & I'm not totally sure why that necessitated questioning about whether or not I'm a feminist, but apparently it did), and I said yes, and then he made it a running joke for several weeks, and I didn't mind per se, but finally I was just like, 'You know, I think our definitions of feminism are different. I think I'd define myself more as an equalist, when it comes right down to it.' And he hasn't really said anything since.

We also have a police officer who comes in periodically and he's made several sexist comments both to me and other female co-workers (one time he came in when Kate was sweeping the cafe and he said, 'Ah, a woman who knows her place and what she should be doing!'), and I patently refuse to serve him, because I'm not putting up with that, even if this is Texas. (Which is to say: nothing against Texas, honestly, but my Mum and I were just discussing the other night how clearly defined gender roles are here, as opposed to where we grew up in California, and how difficult it is to deal with that, and how some things you just have to let go.)

Also, I really want that icon about wanting equal rights = wanting to invade Poland.

[identity profile] wanderlight.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
That is a completely excellent way to put it: equalism.
I find it distressing that when I talk to my female friends, they're often, "Feminism? That's crazy shit." I was like this in junior high, I have to admit, before I realised that feminism wasn't extremism, it was reaching for equality -- because it doesn't exist right now, and to think it does is to put blinkers in.

... *shuts up* :)

[identity profile] builtofsorrow.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Yesss. My sister and I have spent a lot of time talking about things like this since moving here because race and gender issues are so much more pronounced than they were for us growing up (honestly? until I was seventeen, I thought racism was entirely eradicated in the US), and we decided that was the term that sort of encompassed all of this for us.

To be honest, I'm not totally pleased with it: I hate that 'feminism' has such a negative connotation, like it's something I should be ashamed of, and I'm not, but describing myself as an 'equalist' both encompasses more and doesn't immediately put me on the defensive.
ext_3321: (Default)

[identity profile] avendya.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Amy, you rock my world. I've been thinking about much the same things lately - I'm getting blasted with sexism at school, and Noldo has been going through sexist hell.

I am seventeen years old. No, I haven't had a boyfriend. No, I have no interest in having a boyfriend at the moment. Why?

Maybe because I'm interested in a guy who cares about more than getting me into bed. Maybe I want a friend as well as a boy. Maybe I want someone who takes me seriously, as a scientist, as a student, as everything that I am. And maybe I'm willing to wait for that, rather than dating the first guy who expresses any interest in me.

I am sick of being asked if I have a boyfriend, and being treated as a child because I don't. I am sick of being told that I'll give up this physics stuff when I go to college and meet a nice boy. I am sick of the implication that a woman on her own needs a man, but a man on his own is his own master (to quote Pratchett).

I am sick of being told I need to look prettier, that "I could be smart and pretty", that my entire worth as a human being can be determined by how much I look like a model.

I am sick of the implication that women don't need careers of their own. I am sick of the idea that guys have to go get well-paying jobs and women stay home and take care of the children. I am sick of people (both women and men!) telling me that this is the only option if you want to be happy. (Look at my family. My mother is the one who started her own business. Dad quit his high-paying engineering job and now works with her.)

I am sick of being told I act too much like a guy, that I need to act (and look, don't forget looks) more girly. I'm sick of my (female) computer science coach not believing that I can program because I have girl parts. I'm sick of being told that I shouldn't be who I am because of my gender, that I should love shoes and worry about my hair.

I'm sick of that this isn't limited to women; that men who aren't "manly" aren't right, and god forbid should you be transgender.


I do science and math. I hang out with guys. I'm sarcastic and not exactly friendly. I talk cars and computers. I refuse to eat salads; I'll take a salad any day. I also like going shopping with friends, gossiping, and sometimes want to dress up for no reason at all. You know what? None of this has a thing to do with my physical gender. It's me, as an indivdual. Nothing more. Nothing less.
ext_3321: (Default)

[identity profile] avendya.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it's a bitch and it's horrible, but the only good thing is that it is changing. Women hold positions of power, women can own their sexuality (or at least more than they did), gay marriage is on the political agenda in the States. There are other people on our side, and we'll change the world.

No, seriously. One of my classmates in Speech asked me if I'd go to Homecoming with another classmate I've spoken to all once. I said that I'd say no. He was very confused about this, and didn't get why I'd turn Chris down if he asked. I don't know, because I don't know anything more about him than his name?

You might talk to Noldo. She's on her way home (California, that is), now, I think, but she's been in a socially far more conservative culture for a month. The limitation on good Indian girls - because it is about girls, not women, who are in control of their own lives - are extremely scary.

[identity profile] wanderlight.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
we must be smart *and* hot in that oh-so-narrow, traditional sense

*nods* That's one thing that really drives me crazy. I think that in a lot of areas, society IS making progress, largely because of people like you who speak up. :) But North American culture seems stuck at a point where, okay, yes, smart women are finally respected -- but they still have to be hot. And be able to juggle their "family life". And be suitably feminine. To which my response is, um, hello, THAT IS STILL A DOUBLE STANDARD.

[identity profile] glass-icarus.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
i totally just stepped over here again because i noticed your link, and this? I'm interested in a guy who cares about more than getting me into bed. Maybe I want a friend as well as a boy. Maybe I want someone who takes me seriously, as a scientist, as a student, as everything that I am. And maybe I'm willing to wait for that, rather than dating the first guy who expresses any interest in me.

SO MUCH WIN, and that's exactly how i feel. it's super-frustrating these days because my co-labbie, who is a postdoc and extremely intelligent (if occasionally extremely silly), keeps telling me that "if you don't snap them up now, there won't be so many [guys] to pick from later." ARGH! it's my life, isn't it? why should anyone make a timeline of my relationships? goodness knows i'm not! my first (and only, and now ex-) boyfriend i met the summer after my sophomore year of college, precisely because he was the first person who saw, understood, and accepted every part of me as a human being. why should i, or anyone, settle for less?
ext_3321: (Default)

[identity profile] avendya.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Also, I want to link to this, but it's friends-locked. Any chance it could be unlocked?

[identity profile] magic-at-mungos.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
*go you* I feel your anger so much. And do you want to come to Black Pride (http://www.ukblackpride.org.uk/index.asp) next year? Or just Pride?

I'm writing femmeslash for my [livejournal.com profile] harry_holidays assignment and it makes me sad that there isn't more femmeslash out there.

Looking back at my fic recs (http://magic-at-mungos.livejournal.com/tag/fic+rec) I do rec a whole mix of stuff even though I'm a complete hypocrite and write mostly gen and slash.
Edited 2008-09-24 21:13 (UTC)

[identity profile] magic-at-mungos.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 07:02 am (UTC)(link)
Yes write more. Write Martha/Donna/Rose *enables you*

[identity profile] munditia.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I was directed here by [livejournal.com profile] avendya, and at the moment, I'm giving you standing ovations. You articulated quite a few of my own issues so well that it almost feels like a relief. Thank you.

[identity profile] munditia.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 06:25 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, it is rather frustrating, in a way, especially this point:

I get angry that people don't take me seriously when I do talk about this, that I'm accused of taking things too personally or being overly emotional or young or whatever else.

People have told me time and again that I'm taking everything far too seriously; that I'm blowing some things out of proportion; that I shouldn't exaggerate; that nobody cares if I'm upset...

So, sing it, sister!

Also? Mind if I friend you? You like Doctor Who and Firefly
and Good Omens, and you are a feminist and a friend of [livejournal.com profile] avendya's, which are all bonus points, as far as I'm concerned.

[identity profile] munditia.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you!

*friends*

[identity profile] natertatersmom.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi! Just came over from a nod at [livejournal.com profile] magic_at_mungos. EXCELLENT post. If you are unaware of the Shakesville blog, you need to get over there right now.

http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/

I think you'll feel right at home. :-)
ext_22487: Fangirl and proud (Default)

[identity profile] glinda-penguin.livejournal.com 2008-09-24 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm going to take a moment to enjoy yours too... ;)

Hee, you should have seen what the boys at our school got (I cannot look at those pole kitchen roll holders without sniggering even now) What is it with all-girls schools and avoiding dealing with sex and female empowerment? The one place that should be a breeding ground for feminism, all girls together, aren't girls great stuff and they all seem to be just the opposite. Figuring out sexuality at school is pretty horrendous at school without an environment where acknowledging it is taboo. The perception of masturbation is ridiculously and unnecessarily phallo-centric (http://xkcd.com/194/). As though female sexuality cannot possibly be constructed on its own grounds for its own sake. It's not all about 'filling a lack' women aren't incomplete. Masturbation is about pleasure pure and simple, sex should be about intimacy and shared pleasure, not some mechanical tab A into slot B. Penis' (flesh or artificial) have their place but they're not the be all and end all of female sexual pleasures.

People in general are most definitely hot. That's generally my standard explanation to people going 'but why?' at the bi thing. Forget the whole homogenous plastic 'beauty' in magazines, quirks are half the pleasure in assessing beauty. Diets should be about replacing processed food with fresh not starving yourself. *kicks media and fashion industries*

And, seeing as this comment is already epic, I'm going to provide another link because I found this one while I was looking for the above...I'm going to be a lighthouse keeper (http://xkcd.com/59/) when the floods roll back...Here's to being the girl in the tower, rescuing people...
ext_22487: Fangirl and proud (Default)

[identity profile] glinda-penguin.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, so that's where that comment went to, I thought lj had eaten it but no, I'd just hit new comment rather than reply to this. *head-desk*

I might have to write food meta now. Food attitudes in society are so not healthy in a ridiculous amount of ways.

xkcd is love! I'd forgotten about that too, and it came up when I was searching for the penis one (which sums up my opinion of psychoanalysis especially when it gets anywhere near film theory) and was reminded of how excellent it was and that it was actually fairly relevant to the discussion!

Page 1 of 2